My 14-million-dollar Mistake

Gregg

(5th in the "It’s Not Magic, It’s Math" series)






Short on Time? Skip to the Recap Below!






The Problem


In the early 2000s, The Shark Club hired its first promoters (after more than ten years in business) to increase our business on Friday nights. While the promoters did a great job bringing in more customers, they were surprised our bar sales weren’t higher. These same promoters worked at another venue on Saturday night pulling in similar headcounts to our Friday night. According to the promoters, despite similar headcounts and pricing structures, our Friday bar sales were $5,000 lower than those at the other venue they promoted.


I ignored their input, figuring it was promoter-speak (it’s a thing).


In 2006, we hired Jeremy Jackson of Baywatch fame (who played Hobie) to promote our Saturday nights. It was a huge success. Jeremy Jackson, who also promoted another venue on Friday nights, was shocked that our bar sales weren't much higher. We added a bartender to the schedule. After the second Saturday night with long lines to enter, Jeremy again proclaimed our bar sales were way too low.


We acted; after all, our Friday and Saturday promoters said the same thing: our bar sales were thousands lower than expected for our headcounts. We squeezed in another well behind the main bar to add yet another bartender. We added a portable bar near the dance floor. We also added a beer bar in the lounge.


Sales barely increased. 


I figured it might be a theft issue, so I added expensive towers to our POS stations to display transaction sales totals and hired spotters to look for theft. 


It wasn’t a theft issue.


I gave up.



The Revelation


Years later, maybe in 2008, at the end of a slower Thursday night, I watched my son, who was bartending his way through college, pour a vodka tonic. My jaw dropped when I saw him pour a double but only ring in the price for a single. I went behind the bar, pulled him aside, and told him I witnessed him pouring a double but charging for a single. Unperturbed, he corrected me and said, “It wasn’t a double, more like an 80% overpour,” Then he added, “We all do that.” I refocused on the other bartenders pouring. He was 80% correct.



The overpouring stopped that night. 







The Impact


The most immediate impact of eliminating overpouring was noticed the next night at 1 am,  before we ran our sales report at night end, before eventually noticing an increase in sales.

 

Normally, on our packed weekend nights, positive energy is tangible by 11 p.m. as customers loosen up and become more social. The energy usually peaks at midnight and quickly wanes as too many customers become overly intoxicated, triggering more negative emotions (look for our future blog on the Pleasure Zone study). 

 

By 1:00, most of the staff is on edge, scanning the floor for drunks, altercations, people stumbling, or possibly getting sick.

 

This night, the first night, we weren’t giving our customers an almost full alcoholic drink free for every drink they ordered; the energy stayed comfortable all night, with very few customers we needed to monitor closely as they left at 2 a.m.


I was shocked. After more than a decade of bracing myself as midnight came, this night was a breeze. It continued future nights. Were all the problems gone? It is impossible with a dance club with over 1,000 customers through the doors. We didn't have a single insurance claim from the day we eliminated overpouring.


It would be difficult to overstate the positive change in energy we experienced after eliminating overpouring. Studies tell us that it’s generally not those with BACs below .06% who cause harm to themselves and others. Our experience confirms those studies.


Naturally, to no surprise, eliminating overpouring significantly reduced our spirits inventory expenses while at the same time increasing our spirit sales.


I tortured myself by calculating how much the overpouring cost the business. Yes, it’s $14,000,000. (Notice, this isn’t capitalized.)


 The sad truth is, before our Friday and then Saturday promoters mentioned our bar sales were way too low for our headcounts, for years, my managers would occasionally mention in our biweekly manager meetings that the bartenders were overpouring. What did I do? Simply turn to my bar manager and say, tell the bartenders to stop overpouring.  Did I get back to my bar manager to confirm that action was taken? No. Did I monitor the bartender pouring? No. Despite my managers periodically reminding me that the bartenders were overpouring, I never connected the dots between our low bar sales and overpouring. I can be an idiot.




I’ve made profitable pouring a key part of my best bar practices workshop and our Best Practices for Nightlife Establishments. Overpouring is our industry's most common and significant problem (for businesses permitted to sell spirits). Eliminating overpouring:

·      Increases business profits and sales.

·      Reduces intoxication inside the business (reducing insurance claims and calls for service).

·      Results in far fewer customers driving drunk.



Upcoming in the It’s Not Magic, It’s Math series:

  • The People Behind the Numbers



By Gregg Hanour • October 6, 2026
That's the decision . . .
By Gregg Hanour • September 28, 2026
In our last blog we discussed how the overconsumption of alcohol is the enemy, not the moderate consumption of alcohol. Moderate Drinkers are Safer Multiple research studies have shown that people who consume alcohol and keep their BAC to below .06% are safer. “There is agreement in the scientific community about what defines ‘moderate drinking.’ Also, moderate drinking means limiting how fast you drink and, as a result, keeping your blood alcohol concentration (BAC) below .055.” (Source: Hester) In general, those who drink excessively are more aggressive and also get injured more seriously than those who drink moderately or not at all. Moderate drinkers do not appear to be at significantly higher risk of injury than nondrinkers. (Source: Scott and Dedel) The Higher the BAC, the Greater the Risk of Harm Alcohol follows a dose-response curve— higher BAC leads to higher risk across all major harms, including crashes, injuries, and violence. Harm rises exponentially as demonstrated by this chart from National Highway Traffic Safety Administration on the risk of crashing at given BAC levels.
By Gregg Hanour • September 22, 2026
The Root Cause: Overconsumption of Alcohol T he main purpose of CUP conditions for your on-sale alcohol businesses is to lessen any negative impacts and ensure the operation is in harmony with your community Most problems caused by your bars and restaurants are the direct result of the overconsumption of alcohol—including altercations, nuisance complaints from neighbors, and vehicle crashes. Cities that have calculated the net effect of alcohol businesses on their general fund have discovered a minimum net loss of $1 million dollars—caused mainly by calls for service due to violence and medical problems from overservice. The insurance industry says that 90% of insurance claims at bars and restaurants are the direct result of the overconsumption of alcohol. My experience as an operator and consultant to the hospitality industry suggest that 90% of the time, calls for service are due to one or more customers having consumed too much alcohol. Studies confirm the relationship between higher levels of intoxication and violence. Using Logic to Choose an Action to Solve the Problems Since the goal of writing conditions of approval is to lessen problem . . . And since most problems stem from the overconsumption of alcohol . . . Shouldn’t the conditions aim to lessen overconsumption? In fact, shouldn’t a major focus of your entire approval process—from approving, conditioning, and onboarding—be to message best practices to lessen overconsumption? In reducing the overconsumption of alcohol, all stakeholders benefit: Public safety is improved from less violence and fewer DUI tragedies. City public safety expenses are reduced. Business profits are protected from insurance claims and lawsuits. There are many ways planners and law enforcement can reduce overconsumption in newly-approved on-sale alcohol businesses. In reducing overconsumption, your city saves money—lots of money. This isn’t just our opinion. A Study to Bank On According to this study, for every $1 a city spends to reduce intoxication, it saves $260 (Levy & Miller)
By Gregg Hanour • September 15, 2026
Most city leaders assume their bars and restaurants pay for themselves. The numbers say otherwise—and closing the gap starts with rethinking two common assumptions.
By Gregg Hanour • September 9, 2026
Most city leaders assume their bars and restaurants pay for themselves. The numbers say otherwise — and closing the gap starts with rethinking two common assumptions.
By Gregg Hanour • September 2, 2026
I’ve been known to get a little obsessed with reaching goals — whether it’s catching a trophy brown trout over 10 pounds or hitting a Pick 6 for more than $50,000. Did I accomplish those goals? You’ll find out at the end. Another goal of mine is far more important and challenging: changing how California cities approve, condition, and onboard new on-sale alcohol businesses (restaurants, bars, clubs, and similar establishments). That's why I teamed with retired ABC District Administrator Lauren Tyson to design our upcoming workshop on best practices for conditional use permits (CUPs) and entertainment permits. The current process sucks. Yes, I sometimes use technical language. Who’s Behind This? I’ve spent years training hospitality operators, planners, and law enforcement on exactly this problem, and wrote a book on the topic, A Business Approach to Reducing DUI, along the way. Link to Gregg’s bio Lauren wrote the book on it — literally. As a former ABC District Administrator and author of Perils of Selling Alcohol: A Guide for Bar Owners Facing Legal Trouble, she’s seen exactly what puts ABC-licensed businesses at risk, and what actually protects them and the public. Link to Lauren’s bio How Do I Know the Current Process Isn’t Working? Let Me Count the Ways Personal experience. I went through the process twice — once in Costa Mesa and once in Irvine. In both cases, very smart, dedicated planners, working with law enforcement, created extensive conditions of approval. One business had 32 separate conditions. Both businesses followed every condition, yet both were still public nuisances for years. Working with applicants. Lauren and I have helped dozens of applicants successfully navigate their city’s CUP application process. Yet the operating conditions cities impose rarely (read never) have a meaningful impact on reducing violence or problems. Reviewing city policies statewide. We’ve collected CUP conditions and operating requirements from 35 cities across California, including several known for leading the way in responsible ordinance writing. The reality? A business can follow every specific condition of approval and still become a public nuisance. Training professionals. We’ve conducted in-person workshops for planners and law enforcement on this topic. Presenting at conferences. Together and separately, we’ve presented on these issues at professional conferences. Academic research. While writing my first book, A Business Approach to Reducing DUI, I researched the topic extensively, including contacting five of the leading urban planning universities to review their curriculum. Working directly with operators. I’ve trained over a thousand hospitality owners and managers. I understand their concerns, their daily realities, and why too many close. Revising how cities approve, condition, and onboard new businesses doesn’t just protect city resources and public safety — it also guides businesses toward practices that improve their profitability. The Bottom Line When cities use best practices to approve, condition, and onboard new on-sale alcohol businesses, the outcome looks very different. Applicants who complete the CUP process and open for business will hear consistent messaging — from planners, planning commissioners, code enforcement, and law enforcement — about the operational practices that significantly reduce violence and problems. Applicants will receive meaningful conditions of approval that, when followed, actually reduce risk for all stakeholders. Applicants will experience impactful communication with code enforcement and law enforcement that keeps the operator focused on practices that protect both the business and the community. That’s what effective onboarding looks like. We hope you’ll join us for our upcoming Zoom workshop. And if you twist my arm, I might even share a few brown trout fishing tips. Yes, I did catch that trophy brown — a 17-pound, 7-ounce beauty. I also hit that big Pick 6. If you ask how to hit a $50,000 Pick 6 at the racetrack, my advice is simple: Start with a $100,000 bankroll. WORKSHOP Conditional Use Permits, Entertainment Permits, and On-Sale Alcohol Oversight 📅 Date: Wednesday, October 28, 2026 🕐 Time: 10:00 a.m. – 12 Noon Pacific Time (2 Hours) 📍 Location: Live via Zoom ✅ POST Certification pending | APA Certified 2.0 CM COST -$330 per attendee; or -$990 flat rate per city (up to 10 attendees from your city) Learn more Register for the workshop WHO SHOULD ATTEND This workshop is designed for professionals responsible for reviewing, approving, or monitoring alcohol licenses, including: • City planning officials • Law enforcement personnel • Code enforcement officers • Planning commissioners Everyone involved in approving, conditioning, or onboarding new ABC on-sale licensed businesses must deliver a consistent, informed message at every step of the process — this workshop ensures they can. We offer a significantly reduced tuition for a group because the gains from this workshop grow exponentially when every department is trained together.
By Gregg Hanour • August 24, 2026
Alcohol Best Practices is pleased to announce a new Zoom workshop for public officials and law enforcement professionals involved in alcohol license oversight. Conditional Use Permits, Entertainment Permits, and On-Sale Alcohol Oversight 📅 Date: Wednesday, October 28, 2026 🕐 Time: 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 Noon,Pacific (2 Hours) 📍 Location: Live via Zoom (link emailed upon registration) ✅ POST Certification pending | APA Certified 2.0 CM COST -$330 per attendee -$990 flat rate per city (up to 10 attendees) Learn more Register for Workshop WHO SHOULD ATTEND This workshop is designed for professionals responsible for reviewing, approving, or monitoring alcohol licenses, including: • City planning officials • Law enforcement personnel • Code enforcement officers • Planning commissioners Everyone involved in approving, conditioning, or monitoring new ABC on-sale licensed businesses must deliver a consistent, informed message at every step of the process — this workshop ensures they can. WHY THIS WORKSHOP IS NEEDED After analyzing dozens of Conditional Use Permits (CUPs) from cities across California, we identified critical gaps in how cities handle new alcohol license approvals: Existing CUP processes lack essential messaging to applicants Legacy approval conditions miss the most impactful requirements Newly approved businesses receive little to no meaningful onboarding Until now, there has been no training resource for best practices in approving, conditioning, or monitoring new ABC on-sale licensed businesses. Contracting with us to revise your city's approval and onboarding process is a significant investment. This workshop offers a cost-effective alternative, equipping your team with proven strategies that: ✔ Reduce violence, DUIs and nuisance complaints ✔ Lower public safety expenses and calls for service ✔ Improve the profitability, performance, and professionalism of licensed businesses We look forward to seeing you there. Learn More Register for Workshop
By Gregg • January 6, 2026
(Insight in the “Drunk, Drunker, and High-Risk Drunkenness” series)
By Gregg Hanour • December 12, 2025
(Insight in the “Drunk, Drunker, and High-Risk Drunkenness” series) 
By Gregg Hanour • November 24, 2025
(Insight in the “Drunk, Drunker, and High-Risk Drunkenness” series)